What do you think?
Rate this book
280 pages, Kindle Edition
First published May 6, 2021
Like early explorers returning from their ocean voyages with exotic plants and strange beasts, or Apollo astronauts returning to earth with a case full of moon rocks, he has travelled to inner places that we know nothing about and returned with exhibits to convince the sceptical.
When Robinson asked him about the divinity of Jesus, Blake replied that, ‘He is the only God. And so am I and so are you.’ [...] ‘I live in a hole here, but God has a beautiful mansion for me elsewhere, [...] ‘I possess my visions and peace,’ he argued. ‘They have bartered their birthright for a mess of pottage.’
‘I thought I should have gone first,’ he said, then remarked that, ‘I cannot consider death as anything but a removing from one room to another.’- and it's in earnest I don't quote the entire book (I've said that before about the best ones). Higgs then goes onto explain Blake's long lasting appeal: the unveiling of the monument that attracted thousands with a single Tweet; and the exhibition that garnered a quarter-of-a-million ticket sales.
I give you the end of a golden string
Only wind it into a ball
It will lead you in at Heaven’s gate
Built in Jerusalem’s wall.
Most accounts of Blake’s life and work explain his visions away as a form of ‘eidetic imagery’ – a vivid mental image which a person can see either in their mind’s eye or externally, as if the mental image was part of the observer’s environment.
The author Philip Pullman, who is a prominent critic of religion, has had similar experiences. ‘The sense that the whole universe is alive – not just inanimate, but alive and conscious of meaning – is one that I’ve felt on two or three occasions, and they made such a deep impression on me that I shall never forget them [...] I just saw connections between things – similarities, parallels. It was like rhyme, but instead of sounds rhyming it was meanings that rhymed, and there were endless series of them, and they went on forever in every direction. The whole universe was connected by lines and chains and fields of meaning, and I was part of it. [...] I’m believing more and more firmly in this thing called panpsychism, the idea that consciousness is actually everywhere.
Most of us would experience a similar phenomenon if we were kept in isolation for long enough, away from other people. It is normal for people to start talking to themselves when they are alone for any length of time, and if isolation continues they may start projecting their inner monologues out into the world and argue with people who are not present.
Now I a fourfold vision see
And a fourfold vision is given to me
Tis fourfold in my supreme delight
And three fold in soft Beulahs night
And twofold Always. May God us keep
From Single vision & Newtons sleep
This ‘supreme delight’ was not something he created himself, but something he said was ‘given to me’.
This is perhaps why the countryside, in Blake’s work, has all the qualities of a prelapsarian paradise.- and how Blake consciously wished for a sense of almost-dissociation, or as he called it 'Self Annihilation.'
his loss of a sense of self, it should be noted, is different to the psychological experience known as dissociation, a state in which the mind becomes detached and disconnected, often as a way of avoiding dealing with trauma. Unlike the loss of a sense of self, it is a fundamentally passive experience.
Is ‘the self’ like a little person who watches this information, as if on a TV screen, with eyes of their own? If that was the case, would that little person also have another person inside their head, in order to watch what was going on in front of their eyes? That person would then need an even smaller person inside them, and so on to absurdity.
The adult mind is, in a sense, in a rut. Once it knows what is likely to happen in the world, it does not usually bother itself imagining scenarios that do not fall into this pattern. A child who has yet to develop a fully formed default mode network may spend time imagining what their life would be like if they had a pet dinosaur they could ride to school and impress their friends with. An adult, in contrast, will think about what they need from the shops and what to watch on Netflix that evening. On one level, this is a much more practical and energy-efficient use of the brain, but it may not be the way to a richer, more fulfilling life.
In a 2014 paper called ‘The Entropic Brain’, a team of researchers led by Robin Carhart-Harris from Imperial College London looked at the consequences of what they called ‘entropy’. In this context, the word ‘entropy’ referred to how chaotic or ordered the activity in the brain was, with chaotic, unexpected brain activity being classed as high entropy and calm, predictable brain patterns being classed as low entropy. [...] Addiction, obsessive compulsive disorder, eating disorders, depression and rigid or fundamentalist thinking are all the result of a brain that is too efficient, and which has too little entropy. Where these problems arise, a sprinkling of chaos is needed.
Note that Blake is not trying to remain neutral. His position is not a proto-postmodern belief that all perspectives are equally valid. He is quite prepared to call out one side as good, and the other evil. Instead, his position is that both sides of the clash are necessary, because there is no such thing as light without dark or hot without cold. For Blake, the conflict between these divides is the fuel that moves the universe. [...] Blake introduces the state of Beulah in both of his major works, Milton and Jerusalem, with the line: ‘There is a place where Contrarieties are equally True’.
Urizen is the personification of reason. He is the intellect that creates law, he is controlling and associated with language, and it is he who constructs the human-scale world of rationality and logic in which contrary positions cannot both be physically true. Urizen is the conscious observer that forces Schrödinger’s cat to become either alive or dead.
Because Urizen’s sense of himself as a creator god is built on the denial that there is anything outside of him, he finds this idea extremely threatening and he uses all the logic at his disposal to ridicule it. [...] What he likes above all other things is the idea that he is right, because this takes far less mental effort than understanding error. [...] Like our minds, Urizen has no knowledge of what he doesn’t know and deep down this terrifies him, because it threatens his very sense of identity. He will attempt to belittle, mock, or otherwise deny evidence that there is more than he knows, and that he is not the powerful creator he thinks he is. Deeply insecure, Urizen is the aspect of our minds that needs not just to be right, but to be thought of as right. You will recognise him immediately if you use social media.
In the summer of 1780, at the age of twenty-two, Blake encountered King Mob. [...] Blake found himself at the front of the mob as they surged towards the imposing prison at Newgate. [...] Three hundred convicts were set free [...] ‘Showers of sparks and pieces of red-hot metal shot up into the sky as iron bars and flaming beams and great hunks of elaborate masonry tumbled [...] While all the time the screaming, wild, triumphant figures of the “demoniac assailants” [...] Events quickly turned ugly as protestors abused and beat members of the House of Lords [...] On the walls of the burning prison was painted a declaration: these prisoners had been freed, it said, by the authority of ‘His Majesty, King Mob’. [...] For an anxious and sensitive young man like Blake, the experience must have been traumatic. [...] King Mob usually sleeps, but he still dwells within our psyches.
One factor in this was the rise of what were called ‘masterless men’. In the hierarchical medieval feudal system, it was assumed that men and women were loyal to the lord who owned the land they lived on. But large parts of the population were becoming increasingly mobile, moving around the country as opportunities for work dictated, and hence had no ‘lord’ to speak of. [...] the experience of being masterless was at the root of many religious and political changes
Instead of campaigning, Blake created. He spent long hours as a working engraver, fulfilling whatever commercial jobs came his way, as well as producing his own work- but this does not make him unimportant to the causes of the time.
Swedenborg had produced a body of philosophy and theology that seemed to support the reality of Blake’s visions, and Blake studied his books seriously, making many notes and arguments in the margins.
Now hear a plain fact: Swedenborg has not written one new truth: Now hear another: he has written all the old falsehoods. And now hear the reason. He conversed with Angels who are all religious, and conversed not with Devils who all hate religion, for he was incapable thro’ his conceited notions.
Swedenborg was too comfortable in his own reality tunnel to question how limited it was- but now I'm fairly convinced? Coincidences (coincidances) happen so often, now. What are the chances? (I just read Quantum Psychology).
What is now proved was once, only imagin’d. / The most sublime act is to set another before you. / Expect poison from the standing water. / The bird a nest, the spider a web, mankind friendship. / Without Contraries is no progression. / Man has no body distinct from his Soul for that called Body is a portion of Soul.- with that last one, in particular, wonderfully foreshadowing infinite recursion, the search for the Self, Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem, etc, etc.
[...] he divides humanity into twotypes of people: the Prolific, who produce and create, and the Devourers, who consume. Other writers might praise the Prolific and condemn the Devourers, but Blake understands that both types are needed to keep the world turning [...]
In 1926, Sartre took what turned out to be, with hindsight, an excessive dose of mescaline. As a result, he spent many years hallucinating sea creatures, who made a nuisance of themselves while he attended to his duties. [...] ‘after I took mescaline, I started seeing crabs around me all the time. They followed me in the streets, into class. I got used to them. I would wake up in the morning and say, “Good morning, my little ones, how did you sleep?” I would talk to them all the time. I would say, “OK, guys, we’re going into class now, so we have to be still and quiet,” [...]
Urizen is the personification of reason. He is the intellect that creates law, he is controlling and associated with language, and it is he who constructs the human-scale world of rationality and logic in which contrary positions cannot both be physically true. Urizen is the conscious observer that forces Schrodinger’s cat to become either alive or dead.For better or worse, the whole book is not like this, but, to his credit, Higgs points you (on pg. 266) to another volume which promises to perform this task: S. Foster Damon’s A Blake Dictionary, published dog’s years ago but apparently still the gold standard for attempts at Blake-comprehension.